I often wonder about the real purpose about reviewing anything from Pixar, or for Disney, for that matter. I know the legions of fans will go in droves, anyone with grandkids or babysitting responsibilities will also find their way there as soon as possible. Will I have an effect? And does anyone ever care? I even paid to see Cars 2. And, bucko, that theater was PACKED.
Why didn't this go straight to video? Why did we release it wide? Oh...merchandising...
And, yes, Pixar's done it again with a movie that's for adults...and children. It's amazing that Hollywood hasn't taken this formula and used it, you know, on things like original movies. Instead, they'd rather fall back on movies where they can promise a legion of nimrods who don't like to think during their movies.
But not Pixar. Strong storylines, full plots, amazing humor bits that fit in classic movies, all with very little violence or graphic details (okay, well, usually, I'm excusing you, The Incredibles). In fact, when you think about companies like Pixar and Google and all the new ways they manage their businesses and the successes they experience, it's a wonder if no one in the business world has any ability to read. I don't even work in business. Yet I've read the articles. I know about their open-hours philosophies and due dates, the ability to bring your pets, the free food....all to keep minds open and juices open to The Next Big Thing.
And they create wonderfully original things with that energy, like Inside Out.
And Pixar is that big thing. I'm serious here. The entire movie is based on, get this, How Your Freegin' Brain Works. Completely droll topic made into vivid colors and a practical story takes an ordinary storyline and turns it into something epic. In this tale, very much like the Brain Control attraction at the former Wonders of Life pavilion, the five core emotions we all have (in differing measures--joy, sadness, disgust, anger, and fear) are at the helm of a 12 year old girl who is moving from Minneasota to San Francisco. A time of great potential (Joy is at the controls!) and possible diasters (Fear and Disgust!). Of course, like all of these movies, hiccups occur and the young Riley finds herself at a crossroads--of growing up.
And she plays hockey! Oh, you betcha, those Minnesotans...
But the story is told with such tenderness about giving up the older experiences for newer ones is turned into a great presentation that allows each vocal talent to shine. Pixar hired five comedians/commediennes to fill out the roster and they swoon in their rolls. Anger, Napolean-short and firey-red, I mean, is played by Lewis Black. When is he not yelling during his stage persona? Joy? She's played by Amy Poelher from Parks and Rec and she's exactly what you'd expect. Happy and motivating to everyone, even when the outlook is massively bleak. The real standout? Phyllis Smith from The Office. Her character, Sadness, is not really built for a joke or to be the blunt of one. However, her wit shines through (thank you writers Pete Docter and team) by showing why Sadness even exists in our hearts. And the deft vocals make you care for her and her plight.
Joy motivates, Sadness copes.
Is the movie a tear-jerker? Absolutely. It also talks about how we use our emotions to flavor memory and how those memories build upon themselves, creating knowledge from their retention. Yes. It's that complicated for a kids movie. But, being Disney/Pixar, they animate it and present it so slowly, that even the smallest kid might get something. And, also because it's Disney, they fashion an approachable story where two emotions, Sadness and Joy, find themselves locked out of the mind during a crisis and have to grapple with returning through the workings of Riley's inner being. Apparently emotions can grow and change. Who knew?
I highly recommend a visit, even if you aren't a fan.
It goes without saying, of course, I'm writing a book.
I'm always, let's face it, writing a book.
But this novel is different. See, in this one, a fantasy tale, I'm attempting something totally different-world building. For the first time, ever, I have visualize a place that doesn't exist and make it constant for the reader, as well as myself.
Which means "place" has been on my mind alot lately. I mean, really. Setting is so much more than, "it happened on a dark and stormy night." Of course that homicide did. It was dark, things lurked in the shadows; the rain hid the approaching footsteps.
But what about tales where the 'setting' became part of the presentation? Where the setting could happen there and no place else? I give you these few titles to ponder and view, and think about, where that setting was imperative to telling the stories.
I took some liberty here. One is a book, I'm sorry to say, because, even though there is a film, the book-by FAR-is so much better. I've also took a moment and really had to ponder editing fantasy or science fiction. Understand my reasonings-they're worlds upon themselves and therefore, vital to the presence of the tale. However, I did include it if the location was so unique, it became a character upon itself. Take a look:
5. Dirty Harry and his relationship to San Francisco.
You have to picture that the once mayor of Carmel-By-The-Sea, just driving up the road, doing a sequence for the movie and being home by dinner time with his dogs and wife. It's no wonder why San Francisco was his pick for these actioners. And it's a great choice too. With angled streets and tight small corners, clear skies but mild weather, the picture is, by far, more photogenitic than anything in Los Angeles.
Better, San Francisco has an older charm to it, so it is also born for mystery, like London or such. So of course Dirty Harry Calahan is going to have some issues to solve. Very good stuff.
4. TRON and TRON: Legacy
I had wanted to avoid science fiction, because such settings grow and breathe to the whim of the creators and don't truly take on an ownership of it's own. But, in the world inside of the computer, the realm they exist in is what they're fighting to maintain. it literally becomes why they exist. They are searching for a way to keep their neon world alive and moving. And, due to the novelty, all concepts are off the table. Rain? Light? Wind? Mountains? All are thrown away for a new visual acuity that is mesmerizing.
3. Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil
THE BOOK. Okay, maybe the movie. I nixed the movie for two reasons. One, Clint is already represented here; two, the movie is nothing like the book. The book is told in the first person, a faceless author who, through the magic of authorship, we become. We experience the world through his eyes. No stiffled romance, just as an observer, opinions and all. As I read the book, however, it went from travelogue (perfect for a blog post about settings!), to crime story without any hint on the front or back cover. It's amazing. And, with it, I learned more about Savannah, Georgia than my hometown. I need to see that place! Check it out.
2. Manhattan
Basically, any Woody Allen movie, even as of late, as he serves up Barcelona and London, works for this. He loves his home city. To the point, I've noticed after time, the humor doesn't work unless you know someone who understands the term, "nebbish." The jokes are not so much in-jokes, but just sophisticated enough that only someone from the Big Apple can get. Romance is stilted, jokes are casual and real, Jewish comedy is pervasive and...oh, the food and the uncomfortable pauses. But, in this movie, you have the shicsha in Diane Keaton, the perfect foil, against his awkwardness in a city that, truly, never sleeps..or sleeps well, when it does. Pay a visit to his other pictures in New York. They are a photographers' dream of the world of the metro.
1. Paris, Je t'adore
Art film, short film, autuer theory and one very beautiful city all collide. However, due to the mix of styles, the presentation is inherently uneven, but, truly, you do get to have an understanding of the City of Light. The filmmakers capture something of the heart in each story, so, we, as an audience, see a city that is basically a place to find romance and some kind of off kilter magic in very turn. Comedy is limited, but sexuality is high in some of the pictures, but it's a great introduction to watch on the plane as you fly into Charles deGaulle airport.
There...some thoughts about settings. Take a look!
Just a quick note to let you know that I'm still alive!
Wow, that was a violent video, wasn't it? I mean, really.
As a Taoist, as a Buddhist, I detest violence. I do my best to diffuse it, to rub in into something else. Sometimes humor, sometimes arguments, but it is something that must be avoided. People in the Deep South find it weird I don't have a gun. For me, that's just asking for trouble.
Please note, I did say conflict was alright. Just not...violence. Not the bodily harm.
So, wait, why do I love martials arts movies? I suppose I could get all Freudian on my own butt and talk about the need to be primal, to have some sort of expression of the basal emotions on a level that would not be appropriate in polite society. Yes, that might be true, and I might even agree to it.
May I point out, however, that, even Gandhi agreed with war-when all other options have failed.
My theater arts teacher, during one scene I had of conflict in a play I was directing, said something very profound to me. She said, "humans seek the positive. They don't want to smack each other unless they're not themselves. Always seek the positive in every scene."
Given that and the Mahatma's comment, sometimes, stories resolve themselves into violence. Sometimes violence is the option. Sometimes the violence is the substitution for something else and the physcial manifestation of it. Violence is alright in fiction, if all other options have failed.
I'm currently working on a novel and they are being attacked by the Undead. Well? There you have it. YOu can't talk them down off of their Undead-ed-ness. But that's okay. Could a story like Silence of the Lambs be told without the violence. Nope. Even that, at the beginning, good old Hannibal is just talking. He's talking about being violent with Clarice, but he is not being violent...not yet.
I'm not talking about torture porn. That's just bad. Screw Saw.
I'm talking about Fight Club. But let's look at the recent Avengers: Age of Ultron. I felt that could have been toned down, but, it was a bit excessive. Jurassic World? It talks about science, but degrades itself into horror. Star Trek was one of the few where they tended to find alternatives to fighting and violence (however, I think there's a message there, too....that there is always physical conflict and war, no matter the time).
So? When you create, always ask, should there be violence?
Sidenote: I don't think it's an issue of masculinity, either. Watch movies like Aliens and Kill Bill.
Woman are woefully underrepresentated in cinema and that pisses me off. And, yes, they can commit violence.
Take a moment and try to understand violence. Does it serve the narrative? People often wonder, since Christianity states "Thou Shall Not Kill," (yet they frequently support wars, go figure...); what about Buddhism, which doesn't actually state anything like that. With us, it's an issue of intent. Violence is not appropriate, depending on the intent of the fight. You stomp a bug? When there's no reason to-that violence. You kill them man strangling your wife? Defense. Think about it.
Stuff to think about. And stop hurting each other.
This author points out something I, perhaps didn't consider, when it comes to special effects in movies. I've tended to blame scripting for the holes I'm encountering when watch special effect-laden pictures, and, by-and-large, that still holds up. However, this gentleman points out, by animating the background, they're pushing the audience farther away from relatability. Take a look...
As I start to blog just a bit more, I decided to, perhaps, just answer a few of Mr. Pivot's famous questions, made known via the famed television program, "Inside the Actor's Studio." The program, itself, is actually wonderful. A talkshow that actually deals with the art of creativity and creating. At the end, after questions have been asked, Mr. Lipton asks these ten questions. So? Here we go....
1. What is your favorite word? Peace. I think that's self explanatory. I use it as a sign off, but, also, as a reminder. We only get one chance at this. 2. What is your least favorite word? Hate. It's really noticeable this week. When Obama was elected, many of my friends of African American decent were estatic and rightfully so. And then, right there, on social media, others said some awful, awful things. They could have felt them, that's alright, but wait until the fervor had reduced. I look to this week, with it's wonderful announcements of marriage equality and, *boom*, the haters, like vultures, swoop in to make sure everyone shares in their created misery. 3. What turns you on creatively, spiritually or emotionally? I have many, many muses and most of them are mundane. I look at a rushing brook and imagine a young boy caught in the current and being wisked off to horrors downstream. I hear a clap of thunder and wonder about the pain it has caused. These things are immediate and without my control. However, they do tend to surface when I'm relaxed. I noticed my husband, when he's relaxed, suddenly is flustered with energy. God forbit we're in a Disney Park somewhere. But there is one muse that is always relied upon to keep my brain active and a-flurry. Him. My beloved. He takes me on those adventures, his statements challenge me to think even more. He reminds me to meditate; when I am sad, he brings my emotions back to where they should be. Him. He's my "turn-on."
4. What turns you off creatively, spiritually or emotionally? I wish I could say, "hate" again, but that's also not very true. I mean, when I encounter hate, they, too, end up in a tale or causing me to post something or write a letter. So that doesn't work. I'm actually, well, going to go in a very normal direction here. Sleep. Sleep kills me. A long day of work, when I should be writing, when I should be digging into my soul? Bamm. Out. I should be reading! Nah. Laziness and staring at the television. That kills me, that turns off my creative mind. Probably good I said that. I kinda see that now.
5. What sound or noise do you love? Having worked with the hearing impaired for more years than I haven't, sound is a weird thing for me. I need it, but just because the silence is something I'm so accustomed too. Remember, too, when I look on social media, to me, taht has a sound-even if it's written word. But it rings in my head as audible, I respond to it like a heard noise. But there's one sound I totally imagined when I read this question just now. Laughter. True, unmitgated laughing. Not the kind that comes from the spoils of induced pain (that does have it's place, however), but the giggles and snorts that hit us and lift us. I remember once we had this shitty-ass movie in theater three. "Weekend at Bernie's." Corpse humor that Family Guy would be proud of. Crap. Empty houses when it played. Then? THis senior couple comes in, stormy night, needed something to do after ice cream, and they got tickets. I'm sitting in my office, working on payroll and I just hear this laughter. Not just laughing, but, like, deep breathing and unable to catch their breath. I sent in an usher and he brought me in. The couple was losing control on the whole thing. Just couldn't keep it in. And I elected to not stop them, they weren't bothering a single person. And my whole staff just loved it. They came out, smiles big, telling the concessions to go see it. I see it at the exit of something like Space Mountain. Just smiles and laughter. We have such a limited time on this earth. You gotta laugh. And a deep, joyful one.
6. What sound or noise do you hate? I want to say, "weeping," but that, too, has a place in this universe. We are entitled and must feel saddness every once and a while. No. The noise I hate? This is weird. Repetition. Repeating ourselves. When someone doesn't get it the first 8 times. Why does this create my ire? I know about the joyous haters that are celebrating marriage equality right now. Oh, you don't think they're celebrating? They are. This plays right to them. Now they can play that victim card again and again using the same tired words without improving their arguments. They have suffered. They're in pain. And everyone's against them. They're heading to Starbuck's they're so upset.
7. What is your favorite curse word? (stars with pre and post indicators will suffice) My mother blessed me with the wit and verve of a bookish Irishman. To ask me my favorite swear word is to ask me my favorite food. I love words, plain and simple. They compose so much of my life. However, if I were to really echo-locate one? The one that gets me going? F**k. It is so good. Happy. Sad. Verb. Adjective. Noun. Angry.
8. What profession other than your own would you like to attempt? Well, you're looking at it. What I would do to be a full time writer. Just writing. Screenplays. Teleplays. Or? Acting. I don't have the model looks, but I think I could be someone on the screen of some sort. I keep thinking a sitcom. Lastly? An Imagineer. I would love to create for a living, I'm thinking I'm saying.
9. What profession would you not like to do? Anything in the world of medicine. I don't think I could handle when my mistake kills someone. Or that I prescribe something and they end up a vegetable. No way.
10. If Heaven exists, what would you like to hear God say when you arrive at the Pearly Gates? "You did well, my friend. You did right." Well? Peace....
My friend posted an article about there not being any leading men left in Hollywood.
I beg to differ.
The author points out the same arguement we in the entertainment business always love to make on slow writing days. "It's just not like it used to be." We'll watch a classic movie, like my favorite, Casablanca, and wonder who would take the place of Rick in a remake or something. We can never find that perfect person and then we'd quip, "yeah, there just isn't any star like that any more."
I've caught myself making the same comment on numerous times.
The fact is, that's just not true, folks.
When a performer is skilled, they take the written page and make it come alive, complete with the quirks and complexities that make a character become a person.
Case in point: Jurassic World.
I really wanted to hate this movie.
The world is a bad place right now. A really bad place. We, the American people, are under the thumb of corporations. I know it sound like a manifesto, but hear me out. Everything is about making that bottom line and making money, for, like four white dudes who have so many houses, we'll never find them. They own the government and they own the media. And? It means that creativity is shafted for money making. Indie films exist. But if you want to see them, they have to go under the radar. The only movies that are greenlit have to make money. That means sequels or reboots. You can see it on Broadway. Tourists won't waste their dollars on the new musical. They know nothing about it. But if the musical was based on a movie they already saw? Sure!
Hollywood sees this. This summer's releases are all reboots. Or franchises. I want so badly to hate them all.
I really, really do.
But I can't?
Because of a leading man.
And the article states that there's just not any good men left.
I saw a brief clip from Jurassic World and, like my buddy, Joss Weadon, I saw it as sexist and deserving of derision. I saw charicatures spouting dialogue that was cut from a Lee Majors film in the 70s. It hurt my heart.
See, I had seen the original movie in 1993 with a dude I was totally crushing on. And I had read the original book as well. But I put those hopes and dreams to bed. And started the full-blown hating on this "World."
My love for filmgoing overcame me. Nothing has been playing. Everyone on social media was swooning over this movie. I laced up my popcorn and headed out to the multiplex.
A-hating I would go! A-hating I would go!
And then Chris Pratt zoomed onto the screen. I had noticed him prior in my beloved Parks and Rec. He took a one-note character of schlub and made him into something zany enough that I was reminded of so many Marx brother zingers. Almost surreal, heady jokes, that he sold on his chrisma alone.
Guardians of the Galaxy came next. A majorly funded, big screen release that was not a sequel OR a reboot. And, here's the tic, he was still funny with the character, but there was a slight change there. A different character.
And I noticed something.
He was a leading man. Good looking, but able to sell a 'superheroes in space' saga with a certain kindness that the whole 'orphan' bit helped us connect with him. His range is a bit limited, but I'm slowly starting to realize there's something more there in his potential.
Jurassic World gives more credit to him.
You just watched that terrible scene. That poorly written scattershot, sexist sequence.
But it dries up as soon as it spews out. In fact, the spectacle of the movie really does carry the weight of this flick. Is it good? Sorta. It's fun and so very loud, you might even notice that you've been here before with the same characters yelling the same things. I've always pointed out that with the increase and ease of special effects, decent writing is paramount. There's no decent writing here. It's truly a B-movie.
Look at Chris' character, Owen. He was in the Navy. And now he's training dinos. Exactly WHY is he on Isla Nublar again? Does anyone know? Or do we care because he's just doing the things we need him to do for a variety of action sequences? Pretty much. But Mr. Pratt is talented enough to move above the wobbly presentation and make us want to go on the journey with him. This, my friends? This is what makes a leading man.
Is the movie? Very much so. Jolts and surprisingly little bloodletting, even though we see many, many redshirts get munched upon. Only one spews any kind of gore. Exactly how does that work? Oh, Universal needed kids to go see the movie, so, edit, edit, edit. But, yes, I did find myself tense. Not because I really cared if anyone in particular died (several should have), but because I had no idea how the complicated action sequences would pander out. That's okay. It's been the salt-and-pepper of every martial arts movie.
It does work on the big screen, where the dinos are comparable to their size and, well, since many of you, dear readers, don't live near a Universal Studios theme park, such things might fulfill the void of a roller coaster. Nothing really to see, just lots of ups and downs.
So, basically, Jurassic World is a very expensive B-Movie, built for the drive in. You cannot help but NOT like it. It's built to put butts in seats. But, in the end, no new ground has been covered.
My friend, who posted that original article did ask, "so, Roo, what do you think are the true American male leads, then?"
Here are some performers that are worth visiting every time they're on the screen.
Matthew McConnaughey
Denzel Washington
Channing Tatum
Robert Downey, Jr.
Vin Diesel (yes, I said it)
Tom Cruise (as much as I hate him, he is magnetic and can act...he just takes shitty roles)
Jim Carrey (an INCREDIBLE performer but Americans are too stupid to see him outside of anything but comedy)
Ben Affleck (he is something of a Masshole and tends to, like Tom Cruise, handle the press very poorly)
Matt Damon
Michael B Jordan
Miles Teller
Antonio Bandaras
The list goes on and on. And you have an opportunity to see one of these leading men as he rises. I hope his success continues. I'd like to see him do more.
For years, I've been sneaky. Every year on Father's Day, I'd make a decent, but not grand, breakfast for the husOtter. I'd take him out to lunch. I'd give him one thing or another that he had remarked. I'd not wrap it; I'd not actually admit taht it was for Father's Day.
Then?
We moved to Florida.
I'm not sure what came over me. I finally added a card and some wrapping and the light bulb clicked. It was a good feeling before. It was like I always recognized him for who is and why, again, he's so important to me, my family, and this corner of the universe we call home. I give him small gifts all the time; I give him kudos whenever the time allows. He never questioned it at any point.
And it took him until he got cards that he, truly, was a father-figure.
I don't mean that in any prurient manner, either. I know there's a huge "daddy" fetish that floats around; I know there's a huge crossover into the Bear sub culture. It meant that I valued his role in the family unit.
See, cause, I'd do the same on Mother's Day. It only became a big deal when I moved and gave a card for him on Father's Day. I noticed, for some reason, that when we got our puppy, and tacked it onto seeing him interact with others, kids, our cat, our other corg, that, yes, he was befitting a Father stereotype. No humor, no irony. Just something I noticed.
It was a wonderful Father's Day.
Something interesting, however, did happen this year that made me stand up and take notice of the holiday that I never had before. Now, understand, I buried the church-right-idiots long ago when they sang their, "you didn't have any strong father-figures" in your life eons ago. My Big Brother mentor was a cop and showed me how to shoot a gun. My stepdad taught me all the stuff about cars I like to think I needed to know. My older brother was enough of a fucknut that I learned wrestling at age 3 and how to be an assholic bully by age 10. Manly men shit came at me in a rapid pace-and I figured it out in a early point in my life. No. I"m gay because I was born that way. In my heart. In my head. Nothing to do with the men in my life. Or everything to do with the men in my life. Or something.
Being gay, I had also resigned that I wouldn't be a parent without a heavy dose of assistance.
Like a uterus.
Either a rental or a full out purchase of one.
And uteruses are parently expensive. I had accepted this as a possiblity and I was okay with it. I had to make my peace with it. For I came from an ethnic family and there was the ongoing stressors of family making that come with that. Kids means the family goes on. So even brief humor at the family Christmaskkah shindig carries a hidden weight that would always have to deal with. I made my peace with that too.
Then shit happens.
Florida hates gays. Most of the state is founded in the Deep South, who, about a week ago, figured out that the Civil War was a racist endeavor about a week ago and seems to be surprised. So hating gays is about as simple as being a Southerner. So, moving here I knew, even if wanted kids, I couldn't. I was cool with that.
Since I had made my peace.
But they fucking removed the law.
So much for keeping an external locus of control.
It's easy to blame the government when they have a schmuck-ton of laws, but when it comes clear that all avenues are open and there really isn't any excuses.
And the floodgates opened. I started thinking again. I felt this inkling. This feeling deep down.
I went ahead and dragged out the checklist. I had found a job that I enjoyed that involved working with children. I had only worked with middle school and high school before and that was painful enough to keep me away from the pines of parenthood. Now? the joys were in front of me. Secondly, time had passed me. I have more gray than black/brown hair. My husOtter's turning 50. Wait. I live in Florida. They keep having kids down here. 90 year olds. Thanks fertility. Luckily, my job keeps me in touch with many how are miserable. They'll have a kid with all A's in their classrooms and they'll wonder why they're not A+'s.
That part stuck in my head.
Hardly enough to not become a parent.
THat's when I realized, deep down, parenthood is inherent. It's like being gay, it happens deep in the noggin', an inkling, that is part of being. It's vital; it's hardwired into our existence. We are born to make kids and keep the DNA a-flowing.
I doubt I'll ever have kids; I've raised enough in this lifetime. But I wanted to take this post to realize that, in the end, I guess I did really want to be a dad. And I think I'd be a pretty good one, too.
Happy Father's Day. To me, my family, my husOtter and to anyone else, man or woman, capable of standing up for it.
As an educator, there might be one thing that bests standardized testing for totally antagonizing experiences in the classroom environs.
Public speaking units.
Kids are scared, they can’t write to begin with and they’re all voer the map. I try to lessen the pain by letting them pick their topics about things they love and adore. Of course, this is akimbo to asking them to rebuild Brooklyn Bridge. They whine and kvetch and talk about how horrible of an educator I am by asking them to work on something they enjoy.
Gee, what was I thinking?
But, sometimes, just once and while, there is a cord that is hit. The one girl who loved the pop singer Usher so much that she actually created a powerpoint presentation that rivaled a VH-1 “Behind the Music” episode.
And I’m not a fan of Usher.
With her presentation? I was.
Another student elaborated on remote control cars. I could never get this student to turn in homework, let alone look up from his paperbacks. Let him talk about his five RC cars?
Gold.
I, too, seriously contemplated buying such a toy after his presentation.
It was that good.
The fact is, when someone loves someone or something so much, if they can express their feelings correctly, even the diehard anti-something-or-other really can come to love it too. I really had little feeling about guns until I saw Bowling for Columbine, or thought I knew all the stories of the Holocaust until I indulged in Shoah.
Documentaries, when done correctly, take you to much better places. Now, there is one caveat I should implore you, Dear Reader, to recognize. All documentaries, no matter how much they look like a slick BBC production, all contend with horrible bias. Once a watcher is okay with the person’s opinion, go with the flow.
Now, my first list, as I was contemplating, I realized was truly graced with White Man’s Burden. Nothing of weight, nothing of heft. Seriously. The world might be falling apart around us, if you were listening to the media, and I was acknowledging none of it. So? I reconsidered my choices.
Then I saw this:
This is a fucking documentary about “Sounding Gay.” Fuck. I was riveted.
So, I guess, truly, it is the eye of the beholder, in this situation. It doesn’t matter what I pick as my documentaries. They will probably reflect me more-the depth comes from the filmmaker and the relevancy. Not by my choices.
If I were a documentarian? Here’s some things I would not mind seeing-
Education: I refuse to watch the corporate shrill of Waiting for Superman, a pure self-justification for channeling money to private schools only the wealthy congressman can afford. I hate it when I hear of teachers watching it. Instead, I would love to see the powerful sway private industries have over congress. A large governing body that had no children in the fight. It needs to cover how we lag behind so many other countries in the world (in fact, we don’t), yet refuse to enact their successful systems. Instead, publishers swayed the states to enactlonger, unvalidated (IE: the tests are measured on grade level appropriateness-they’re just….written) tests and then use that to judge the system and then, when failed (they wrote the tests, after all), remove money that can be channelled into, yep, their private coffers and for their private schools. There’s a huge conspiracy here. And it’s hiding in plain sight.
Deaf Smith: I saw some posts recently about Caitlyn Jenner and it was bit upsetting. Not her coming out, that’s awesome. But the fact that many people decided to air their transphobia and talk about her not being a hero.
THAT bothered me.
A hero is defined in many, many ways, I hope people realize that. My mother, for all that she’s been through, is my hero.
And she’s never beat up anyone.
I’ve looked up to the legend of Harvey Milk, an out gay man who played the politics game and won. A hero, yes, and never had to join the military.
So? WHen it came to this column, I pondered the concept of hero. I needed a hero that defied the norm and stood up by just being himself.
A full-on Deafie who fought for Texas...and won! How cool is taht? I can’t help there are so many heroes out there that just aren’t getting noticed. Here’s one. Let’s see it happen.
When Gay was Okay: Currently, I’m reading about the Gay Rights movement from before Stonewall. That, in and of itself, would be a great movie-there are several lines of importance in there-but they mention so many things that happened in ancient history in relation to homosexuality and no one seems to mention.
Gay sex was acceptable in Greece. In Samurai Japan. With the Huns. There was even symbolic marriages. I shit you not.
Then Christianity happened. They needed followers and babies to keep their business moving forward. So? Made anything that didn’t make babies illegal. No touching. No same gender coupling.
But there’s a history there. Even the History channel took a stab at it iwth the History of Sex, but, well, that tended towards the other end of the spectrum.
A Writer’s Life for Me: I find that everyone wants to read my stories, but, since they know me, they’re always trying to find links to my reality and the fictional accounts I create.
Then I diatribe about who is based on who follows.
But what about a series of authors writing their latest works? Following them on a daily excursion and then, alongside, having someone digitally animate their tales as they compose? I’d love to see if they run in parallel-or don’t!!!!
A Walk in the Park: A few people I used to hang with are starting up a documentary about themselves and their fandom, ala Trekkies and other movies about being addicted to something that isn’t immediately health impairing. It got me thinking, too, about there is something there-but what about those that make the magic happen?
I go to Disney much more than normal people should healthly should. I cannot stop. I read twenty blogs trying to get some step up, some moment in time that will keep the happy going for me. I don’t think it’s a bad thing and it says volumes about how my brain and personality works. Some are Jesusfreaks. Some like Star Trek to the point of costuming.
It’s all in how you use it.
But every once and awhile, there’s a moment, a blink into the open door behind the counter- and my brain starts to tick. Even as recently as this weekend, a light was left on while I was going to plunge to my doom on the Tower of Terror and I was transfixed. I couldn’t help leaning away fro the storyline that I had heard a gazillion times and wanted to know what was just beyond there. It ruined the magic, yes, but not for me. No one, I believe noticed.
And it got me thinking.
What about a behind the scenes documentary, one of those 24 hours in the land of dreams and joy? I say, follow three families and three employees over a day at the Walt Disney World resort and see what all happens and the stress of making others happy.
Or? What about widening it to the world? Each one of the parks as it goes through one day. But, aha, there’s the rub, you can’t go anywhere else. Just the parks, all cameras activited on the same day, no excuses. Personnally? I think it would expand just beyond the fans. It would talk about what the tourists don’t experience. That the smiling, minimum wage, job is oging through hell to keep you higher ups cheerful and not yelling at them. I think that’s saying something.
Abs of Steel (tales of the incurably healthy): I go to the gym and it’s massively discouraging. Truly. I see men my age, who are blessed, drink their special kale protein shakes and have abs a person can rebound bullets off of. I’ve switched to heading over there in the morning, since my vacation has arrived and I noticed something. They’re still there. The little hottie McBeefwhistles are there, in the morning too.
Then I realized something. They are there constantly. And the gym is very, very expensive. What do they do for a living? I have noticed a trend. Some work for the gym directly. Some are service members like firepersons and cops. But, still, that amount of exercise they complete has to be incredible. And the diet to keep it.
The ponderances continue. How does having a six pack really change their lives? I look to my husband and he doesn’t have to do a thing about it. They just magically appear and he eats another 22 cookies. Rahrahpancakeeater chows down at a buffet and then wonders what speedo would look best for going into the tanning booth.
But such beautiful things are under a person’s shirt.
Surely, being so blessed must have a result in daily living. LIke being able to suddenly do four hundred crunches at the Starbuck’s.
I noticed, recently, since moving to Florida, that people still die. And their abs? It’s not usually on display, for some reason. I guess I’m starting to wonder the purpose of such an endeavor? It is to conquer the limitations of society’s food craze? Like running a marathon, to prove something?
I want to know. And there’s a documentary in that. Please don’t make it pornographic, either. Just document.
So? Lemme get some popcorn....Lemme know what you think!
I know, it's been a while. It's not like I'm not blogging, for I am.
I'm just not blogging, well, here.
I got a gig, folks. It's a free gig, but it gets me into the writing game's door, a preverbial foot, as it were. I've been awarded with some interviews, some people think I might know something, and my opinion actually carries some weight. And? I even get free tickets on occasion.
If you'd like to see where I've been writing? Take a bop over to orlandofunandfood.com.. Good group of people there. They gave me a chance when several other websites won't. I say "won't" considering I've written for several other websites, for free, and they ignored me and asked me to pay for their events when they happened at my Disney Parks. So?
We moved on.
However, I've been thinking about writing lately and it was time to revisit here. One of my movie critic friends, someone I trust and, apparently, really likes it when I do my movie lists, asked me to make another listing. So? That's what's going on here.
Not necessarily about theme parks, so this seems like the perfect spot to drop a few lines.
Today's topic? The best special and visual effects!!
See, I know a guy. He's an animator. Good one, too, won an Oscar and everything and, well, he and I were having a terrific conversation about the need for special effects. There was a time, way back when, in the times of King Kong, the original, when people bought a ticket to see the wonders of the movie. To be, truly, dazzled by the flickers of light on the screen. That, in and of itself, was worthy of a ticket. Who cares that the movie might have been limp or pathetic, you came to be wow'd. In the fifites, things changed around a bit more. All common sense was thrown aside, including the ability to suspend disbelief, to just be purely entertained by the drive in movies that Hollywood was cranking out.
Then came Jaws and Star Wars. Suddenly, with these pictures, the special/visual effeects came along side the tale you were watching and enhanced it. Usually, the story was so good, you didn't come to be wow'd by the special effects-instead, the movie came alive because of it. The experience was fuller by the presense of image, not the mere suggestion of it. We came to see Jaws to see a movie about a shark, not a facsimile of fish; we went to Star Wars to join on the heroes journey through outer space-and that couldn't happen without special effects and visual effects.
Now, I'm using two terms here, interchangably.
Special effects are usually seen by the actors. The best example I can think of is Jurassic Park. Those dinos in the kitchen? Those were costumes and puppets tormenting the actors. The actors had something to interact with.
That shark in Jaws? Special effects.
Visual effects are slightly different. These aren't usually seen by the actors and are added post photography. The actors in the Millenium Falcon did not see the star field at all as they hit lightspeed.
Combine these two? And you have the fundamental difference between stage and screen. The screen can give a more otherworldly experience slighly better than boards. However, the stage gives you a human element that cannot be replicated on a movie screen.
Keep this all in mind when I take you on a brief trip down the special and visual effects that have truly made me go WOW....
5. TRON (1982)
Here, for the first time for little movie-watcher-me, did the effects upstage the story. A wholly realized world that didn't exist in any reality we had ever experienced. Yes. As a geek, I did actually see this one for the visuals. It was like watching a huge video game. But the wow factor was there, bright and vivid.
But it also showed that the story really, really needed to be built up. YOu don't just make a story around the visuals. You should have a good story, first.
4. Who Framed Roger Rabbit? 1988
Bob Zemekis is a god. No, really. Like Hitchcock before him, he has this amazing ability to combine an incredible story with special effects so unique, you realize that they just blend, seamlessly. Here's where I first noticed him (however, Romancing the Stone is a wonderful movie too). He takes a crapload of animated, violent tropes and then hurls them at the screen, repeately. At the same time, he takes a 1940s film noir detective/crime tale and shows it at the same time. And it works to the point where you start to wonder where the animation ends (a sexy Jessica Rabbit is really just a Lauren Becall mole that we expect in these movies) and the live action begins. It's a deft piece of work that hugely entertaining. Disney tried to market it to the kiddies, but it becomes evident to the adults in the audience this is, in the end, a crime movie with a really stupid ending.
Still WOW!
3. Avatar
I hate James Cameron, technically. I find his movies are overbearing and poorly written. Haven't we seen this before? And when he breaks new ground, he tends to wave his hands around alot to get everyone's attention. LOOK! I CREATED SOMETHING.
But I cannot deny what he did here, at all.
Many have been complaining about the fact that Disney is building a theme park experience around these movies. Rides at the theme parks let you feel like you are part of the story, a virtual experience. When I saw Avatar in 3D and in IMAX, the flimsy story was right there-but I didn't mind, because, when parts of the movie are flying out at me, I felt like, I, too, was somehow transported to Pandora as well.
So I get why they want to make a ride out of this stuff. Oh, and it made a crapload of money by upcharging for the IMAX and 3D glasses and stuff.
But the film is huge testament to motion capture. Unlike animation, there's a human undercurrent here and it shines through to the audience, making it easier to connect and dismiss the fact that the story is "meh." Watch the sides of the screen when Jake walks around the tree tops, as slight whisps alight on him and you in the audience. Watch how rockets are launched AT YOU when the bad guys attack. You feel like you're underfire and suddenly become very empathic to the cause of the protagonists.
No matter what the crappy story is.
I hate the term, but I can't think of a better one at the moment, but I like to think of it as "live-action" animation.
2. Forrest Gump 1994
WHen digital photography was in its infancy, this movie came out. And I realized, slowly, that we cannot trust the uncompromising actuality of photography any more. Before this movie, there was a concept of "photojournalism." It meant that National Geographic or Time could send a learned photographer out into the world and they would just take pictures and tell the tale of the world.
That ended with that movie. Sure! They're still out there, capturing images like we've never believed.
But we might have doubts.
Because of this movie. This movie, also from Zemekis (he won an Oscar for his efforts) seemlessly blends the realities we have all grown up with and adds the protagonist in there. Kennedy met him. His grandfather appears in Birth of a Nation.
The digital photo revolution has begun.
Now? We can do this all on a laptop. But then? This was new and I learned in that darkened theater that I may never trust an image again. Ever.
And it's a good movie, to boot. Slowly, we're shocked by the images, impressed at their special effects abilities. But then? Puft. We get absorbed and accept this new timeline of history. With Mr. Gump being activtly involved.
1. Lord of the Rings trilogy
I will admit, these are not my favorite movies. I find, like James Cameron, that the ego of the director sometimes got the better of him. Luckily, he was graced with incredible actors who based the story in their very human emotions, pulling the audience closer to their hearts.
While the world they inhabit is completely, and utterly fictional. This is a world that can only exist in dreams and in fiction. Very similar to Avatar-it's actually closer to Forrest Gump. Human like experience within the fantastic. Where this is superior? It's not all digital. Frequently, shots had to be overtly planned, I had learned and just mere camera trickery was utitlized to save money and to allow performers to be in the same room-continuing the very human presence. Gandalf towers over the hobbits in their homes. But he's just merely standing closer to the camera, using smaller plates and tea cups.
A final battle surges with animals that we have never seen, a cast of millions populating our field of vision. We fly over the battlefields, pull in close and then see touching, independent moments. As an audience member, we're introduced to the scope, as well as, able to connect to the humanity beneath the tale.
Good stuff!
Now? Go get some popcorn! And tell me what movies you think have the best special effects!!
Friday, September 12, 2014
Look, I don’t have a true issue with English being the
official language of America, I don’t, really.
It makes sense. Most countries have an official language and it’s more
for business purposes. You work here, you need to have a common language. It
doesn’t really matter that English is considered the only class five language
in the world, but, hey, difficulty with learning (I’ve been teaching it for
years) it, shouldn’t be the concern.
What is the concern? Implementation. Look. I LOVE English.
Easiest the best and most worthwhile subject in the world, in my book. I loved
the classes. And it’s surely taken a hit over the years. Standardized testing,
no matter what the BigWigs want us to believe, does NOT measure English AT
ALL. English has too many choices, like
I said, it’s a class five here folks. So? We can’t really use it to measure
anything. I’ve met some of the most intelligent people on the planet, who
cannot write in English. So it would be a poor measure to use towards
intelligence. But with that, I see making it an official language like using it
as a weapon. Now? Idiots standing at the border screaming, “go home!” can now
say, “Learn English!”
Great. That’d be motivating. Sure..create hatred in a group
of people who are down on their luck. We insist they love the sword-the sword
we’re going to use to cut their throats.
Could we make a system where, upon understanding English in a remedial
assessment, they’re granted full citizenship? And let’s use a test that
actually tests English, not one of these government tests they use at the
schools to see how they can close districts…you know, one written by people who
know English?
Wait. No one actually knows English. Those who seem to have
a beef about learning English tend to be the ones who suffered under it so
much. They tend to be the ones who scream and yell about it not being used
enough, anywhere. Yet they can’t seem to
even type.
Is there research to support my observations? No, I’m sure
there’s not. But what I have seen is that English is more of a concept than
really insisting on…”you need to learn English.” The concept is, “we have
another reason to kick you out!”
What can we do? I say this, continue English in the schools.
We have to. And get the kids to assimilate the language.
Offer free classes whenever possible, taught by people who
can help with cultural differences. If they’re Russians, have a Russian teach
it. Stuff like that.
Make it a requirement and part of the immigration process.
Ten classes or something.
And, on a side note, there’s a perfectly legitmate way to
becoming an American citizen. If people are avoiding that manner, the reason
needs to be examined. If we’re having an
immigration issue, that would be the cue. Of course, from my understanding,
there isn’t the issue that so many other countries are having. In fact, our
system is so rigourous, many other countries adopt our systems—but, is it cash?
Is it too expensive? Is it the fact that they don’t have a job yet?
Humorously, I love the fact that they can’t be taking a job
that an American can fill. How many Americans want to be a maid for a living?
None of you. Don’t say you do. Just sayin’….
I guess I saw what so many of ancestors had to go through to
get here. I can see where they are going with the yelling and the screaming.
But that doesn’t fix a problem. That just makes people shut down and be mean.
The dialogue, in English or otherwise, needs to change in format.
And stop using my beloved English as a weapon. It’s a tool,
alright, but there are better ways of helping people learn than by threatening
them.
